As is often the case in times of social and political turmoil, students’ collections fell into the camps of realism or escapism. Some creations, like Steven Chevallier’s vibrant knits (incorporating logos and campaign elements of queer activist movements) or Ricard Baldomá’s sartorial caricatures of Thatcher and Trump (the former in a prim jacquard, the latter in a hunched suit), loudly challenged today’s political climate. Others challenged the fashion system, like Aurore Montagner’s collaged dresses, which were created in close collaboration with Les Belles Entravées, a collective of inmates from the women’s prison of Rennes.
Nostalgia was a common thread, too, as there seemed to be a collective longing for childlike innocence. With dusty blue jumpers and pink polos, Hawi Akrawi explored the topic of the mama’s boy. Emilia Seitz’s bubbly Barbour coat, folkloric dresses and Martín Lüttecke’s clashing tension-knit pieces (tightly cropped and twisted cardigans) symbolised the distortion and sweetness of childhood memories. Throughout the collections, these elements of symbolism and storytelling were combined with a strong focus on tradition-based craft and material innovation. Although IFM’s MA is a fairly new programme, the institution combines the traditional craft-focussed Ecole de la Chambre Syndicale de la Couture Parisienne, founded in 1927, and the 1986, management-focused IFM. For its graduates, this means being two types of designer at once: one driven by artistry and a desire to create fashion for some meaningful change and one that understands fashion’s traditional system, its structures and rules. One has the potential to change the fashion system, the other to thrive in it. Now, the question is, which path will they take?