How do you relate fragility and craftsmanship? Is there an education of the hands of the artisan which is related to this capacity to create strong fragile objects?
I think that craftsmanship is one element that can help to emphasise and express the fragility of a piece of work or object. But I also don’t think an object always has to be strong and durable. I think there is a beauty in the real and imminent possibility of an object being susceptible to breaking or disintegrating, and this is where we can see the beauty in the fragility of something.
When people look at a fragile material, they are supposed to feel moved and inspired by such a delicate thing, but they don’t really understand why they are moved. People are educated in school to make and create objects that are practical, that last and don’t break, but why are we not also educated to create fragile things that easily break? There is actually a real beauty in fragility.
From reading the book “Fragile – A departure from weakness” by Japanese author Seigo Matsuoka, I learnt that the word fragility is not just a simply about the fact something is easily breakable, we should not be so narrow minded about the meaning of the word. It also has many different wider meanings expressing ideas such as unreliability, vulnerability, ambiguity, fluctuation, incompletion, exception, deficiency, fragment, partiality.
Where do you locate the border between art and decoration, if there is any?
There are no borders. Jewellery can be a piece of art but art can also be a piece of jewellery.
If you need to select a unique wearable piece to present a naked body, which would that be?
I think the naked human form is something that is exquisitely beautiful on its own and needs no decoration. The collarbone is nature’s very own beautiful necklace.